She is claiming that she had no intention to deprive Rachel Mhuka of her US$10 000 or Else Event Car Hire of its vehicle. Her hearing was postponed to November 6 by High Court judges, Justices Happious Zhou and Benjamin Chikowero, after the State asked for more time to file its arguments.
H Metro reports that Mai TT argues that the magistrate, who convicted her, erred in her findings that she had used the vehicle as collateral. Through her lawyer, Tafadzwa Muvhami of Muvahami Attorneys, Mai TT submitted that Mhuka had every reason to lie to the court after realising that the car left in her company was repossessed.
It’s also Mai TT’s argument that she had no binding trust agreement with Mhuka and it wasn’t her intention to permanently deprive the car dealership.
COMMENTS